Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

Trumid launches List Optimizer to compare portfolio trades with bond RFQs

The tool evaluates a bond list across execution protocols and estimates net proceeds, including whether mixed buys and sells work better together or as separate lists.

Trumid has launched List Optimizer, a tool intended to help credit traders decide whether to execute a group of bonds as a portfolio trade or through requests for quotes. The company announced the launch on 2 November.[1]

The tool uses Trumid’s pricing and liquidity information to assess a list at both portfolio and individual-bond level. Its comparison focuses on expected net proceeds, so the decision concerns the economics of the complete package as well as the apparent price of each security.[1]

For a list containing both purchases and sales, List Optimizer can compare a combined portfolio trade with separate bid-wanted-in-competition and offer-wanted-in-competition lists. This matters because the value a dealer assigns to the package can differ from the sum of prices available for isolated bonds.[1]

At a glance01

The execution choice

The execution choice
RouteWhat the trader is evaluating
Portfolio tradeA price for the package of bonds as a whole
RFQ-based executionCompetitive quotes for the relevant bonds or lists
Mixed buy/sell listWhether to keep both sides in one package or split them
Live handoffMove from the comparison into the supported execution workflow

Trumid says the tool connects the analytical comparison to live quotation and execution workflows. That makes it a protocol-selection aid within a trader’s existing list process, rather than a separate report that must be manually translated into orders.[1]

Expected proceeds remain an estimate until executable quotes are obtained. A model can indicate which route is attractive under its pricing assumptions, while live dealer responses, list composition and changing liquidity determine the transaction actually available. The launch does not include an independently measured saving across client trades.[1]

Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

Report an error or submit an update