SEC investor-exam proposal would change the eligibility checks for private placements

The SEC’s 30 September initiative could give private-placement platforms an additional way to qualify customers: a dedicated investor examination. The consultation also considers recognising US CPA licences, CFA charters and US CFP certifications, plus the Series 79 and combined Series 86/87 licences, when held in good standing.[2]

This would extend an existing principle. Individuals already qualify through designated Series 7, 65 or 82 licences in good standing, as well as financial and other criteria. Holding a recognised licence is different from simply having passed a professional examination; the SEC’s current guidance points investors to the applicable licensing and good-standing requirements.[3]

Passing the proposed exam would establish accredited-investor eligibility for its validity period; it would not authorise the holder to conduct securities business. The SEC is considering a designation under Rule 501(a)(10), with comments due by 4 December 2026. The proposed route is not yet available.[1]

For distribution, the distinction between Regulation D routes matters. Rule 506(c) permits general solicitation but requires every purchaser to be accredited and reasonable steps to verify that status. Rule 506(b) prohibits general solicitation and allows a limited number of sophisticated non-accredited purchasers, with additional information requirements. Broader eligibility would change the prospective customer pool within those rules.[4]

The separate notice covering Series 79 and Series 86/87 identifies an operational benefit: licence status can be checked through BrokerCheck. That could reduce verification costs relative to establishing income or wealth. The SEC also acknowledges that many holders may already qualify, so the number of credentials is not a reliable measure of newly accessible investment capital.[5]

For platforms, the practical opportunity would be a more standardised eligibility workflow. It would require matching the credential to the customer, checking its status and recording the basis for the decision. A qualification with an expiry date also creates a renewal task when the customer returns for a later offering.[1][5]

Platforms would still need a separate assessment of the offering’s disclosure and resale restrictions. Private placements can provide less information than registered securities and be difficult to sell. A simpler status check reduces one part of onboarding; the investor’s exit options depend on the security and its market.[4]

Report an error or submit an update