Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

FCA and NCA arrest three in suspected organised insider-dealing investigation

The joint operation involved five residential searches and the seizure of more than 30 devices. The case highlights the distinction between a criminal investigation and firms’ obligation to report reasonably suspected market abuse without delay.

Three people were arrested on 13 October in a joint Financial Conduct Authority and National Crime Agency operation targeting suspected organised insider dealing and money laundering. The FCA says more than 100 staff participated in searches at five residential premises in London and Manchester, with more than 30 phones, laptops and tablets seized.[1]

The 13 October notice said the suspects were being interviewed when it was issued. It did not announce charges or convictions, identify a broker or security, or disclose the alleged trading mechanism or loss estimate. That dated status should not be treated as confirmation that the suspects remain in custody on 20 October.[1]

The announcement records an investigation in progress

Searches and seized devices provide material for investigators to examine. The number of staff, premises or devices does not measure illicit transactions, criminal proceeds or victims. Those questions depend on the evidence and any subsequent proceedings.

The FCA describes both civil and criminal routes for addressing market abuse. The joint operation demonstrates the use of investigative powers in suspected organised insider dealing and money laundering; the public notice leaves the eventual enforcement outcome open.[3][1]

Firms report reasonable suspicion through a different process

The FCA’s guidance requires the relevant firms and trading venues to submit a suspicious transaction and order report, or STOR, without delay when they have reasonable grounds for suspicion. The firm need not establish a criminal offence before reporting.[2]

The guidance covers relevant UK trading venues and persons professionally arranging or executing transactions within the stated territorial scope. Reports go through Connect and can include supporting material. The firm assesses its obligation without waiting for the FCA to pre-authorise its suspicion.[2]

An unusual pattern may justify a report while still having an innocent explanation that needs to be tested. The report therefore needs to distinguish the observed orders or transactions from the reason they appear suspicious. That separation helps the recipient assess the evidence without presenting an inference as a proven event.

Market observations have a separate role

The FCA also accepts market observations where, for example, activity lies outside the reporter’s own business or the available information is insufficient for a STOR. This route supplements the reporting framework; an obligated firm still needs to use the required STOR process when its threshold is met.[2]

For the industry, the case illustrates coordinated investigation alongside an existing responsibility to identify and report suspicious activity. The published record currently supports the arrests, searches and interviews announced on 13 October. It supplies no basis for attributing the alleged scheme to an unnamed broker or issuer.[1]

Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

  1. Three arrests in major FCA operation against criminal insider dealing ring Financial Conduct Authority · 13 Oct 2026 · Accessed 20 Oct 2026
  2. How to report suspected market abuse as a firm or trading venue Financial Conduct Authority · 26 Feb 2026 · Accessed 20 Oct 2026
  3. Market abuse: regulatory framework and enforcement Financial Conduct Authority · Accessed 20 Oct 2026

Report an error or submit an update