eToro’s August crypto aggregate invested amount fell 71% despite near-stable trade counts

eToro’s August disclosures imply that the aggregate amount invested through crypto trades fell about 71.2% from a year earlier, even though the number of crypto trades declined only 4%. The company reported 5.3 million crypto trades at an average invested amount of $97. A year earlier it reported 5.5 million trades averaging $325. Multiplying the two measures gives approximately $514 million in August 2026 against $1.79 billion in August 2025.[3][4]

The reconstruction identifies a change that the headline trade count conceals. Customers continued to place almost as many crypto orders, but committed far less money to each. The $1.27 billion implied reduction is not a measure of eToro revenue, exchange notional or customer losses. It is the product of two company-defined activity metrics and should be read as aggregate invested amount.[3][4]

Near-stable frequency hid a 70% fall in trade size

Crypto trade count retained 96% of its prior-year level, while average invested amount retained only 29.8%. Multiplying those proportions produces 28.7% of the prior aggregate, hence the 71.2% decline. This is a different pattern from a platform losing most of its trading customers: the disclosed activity suggests continued engagement at much smaller ticket sizes.[3]

The current estimate is based on rounded counts and dollar amounts. The press release states that percentages are based on unrounded numbers, so the reconstructed year-on-year change will not exactly match a calculation from internal data. The conclusion remains robust because average trade size fell by more than two-thirds.[3]

eToro defines trades as executed opening or closing orders, including self-directed and copy trades. Invested amount per trade is total invested amount divided by trade count. An opening and a closing can each count, and the metric does not equal the market value of holdings after price movements. Those definitions limit comparisons with exchange volume or another broker’s notional.[3][4]

Capital-markets activity was more resilient, but not unchanged

Capital-markets and ECC trades increased 31% to 51.7 million, while average invested amount fell 29% to $197. The reconstructed aggregate is approximately $10.18 billion, compared with $10.95 billion a year earlier. More transactions therefore failed to produce more aggregate invested amount; the estimate declined about 7.0%.[3][4]

The product of a 31% volume increase and a 29% fall in ticket size is close to flat because the percentages apply sequentially, not additively. Using the published levels gives the clearer result. eToro processed about 12.3 million more capital-markets trades but roughly $768 million less aggregate invested amount.[3]

Together, the two activity categories imply around $10.70 billion invested in August 2026, down from about $12.74 billion. Crypto generated most of the roughly $2.04 billion decline. Capital markets represented about 95% of the reconstructed current total, up from 86% a year earlier.[3][4]

More accounts held less capital on average

Funded accounts increased 18% to 4.36 million while assets under administration rose 3% to $20.2 billion. Dividing the two gives about $4,633 of AUA per funded account, down 13.2% from approximately $5,339 a year earlier.[3]

The 2026 funded-account count includes 110,000 accounts added through the Zengo and Bit2C acquisitions. Excluding those accounts for a rough organic comparison leaves 4.25 million, still about 15.2% above the prior-year total. Adjusted AUA per funded account would be roughly $4,753, around 11% lower than a year earlier.[3]

Neither calculation describes the median user. Assets can be highly concentrated, and acquisition accounting can alter the population. Market prices, currency translation, deposits and withdrawals all change AUA. The ratios establish that relationship count grew faster than the asset base, not that every customer reduced holdings.[3]

Activity per account moved in opposite directions

Capital-markets trades per funded account increased from roughly 10.7 to 11.9 in the month, about 11%. Crypto trades per funded account fell from approximately 1.49 to 1.22, about 18%. The platform therefore recorded broader capital-markets activity per relationship alongside weaker crypto frequency.[3][4]

Aggregate invested amount per funded account fell more sharply. The reconstructed capital-markets figure declined from about $2,968 to $2,336, while crypto declined from roughly $484 to $118. Combined invested amount per funded account fell about 29%, from approximately $3,452 to $2,454.[3]

These are monthly flow ratios, not customer account balances. One active person can place many trades, and a funded account can place none. Their value is diagnostic: they show that account growth did not translate into proportionate trading capital during August.[3][4]

Positive transfers coexisted with a weaker interest-bearing base

Total money transfers were $1.2 billion, up 33%, while interest-earning assets fell 7% to $7.1 billion. AUA increased 3%. Positive transfer activity can coexist with lower interest-bearing assets when customers invest cash, withdraw from cash products, move between asset classes or when acquisitions and currency effects change the perimeter.[3]

The monthly release does not provide a bridge from opening AUA to closing AUA. Such a bridge would separate transfers, market appreciation, currency translation, acquisitions and reclassifications. Without it, the figures show that new money was moving through the platform but not why the interest-bearing pool was smaller.[3]

The decline in interest-earning assets may pressure user net-interest income unless yields or retained spreads improve. Second-quarter user net-interest income had risen 10.4% year on year. August’s balance signal belongs to the following quarter and cannot be used to restate the Q2 result.[1][2][3]

Gross crypto revenue is not the same as retained economics

eToro reported second-quarter crypto gross revenue of $1.35 billion, down 29.7%. That figure includes pass-through economics associated with the crypto assets and must be read with the corresponding cost before assessing net contribution. It is not comparable with a conventional brokerage commission line.[1][2]

The August activity reconstruction likewise cannot be multiplied by a guessed spread to derive revenue. Asset mix, jurisdiction, volatility, pricing and opening versus closing trades can all affect contribution. The calculation demonstrates customer behaviour, not the exact financial effect.[1][3]

The pattern can support more than one interpretation

A constructive interpretation is that eToro retained crypto engagement while customers used smaller amounts, reducing individual exposure during a cautious market. Another is that the platform’s crypto relationships became less economically productive. The present data cannot distinguish deliberate risk reduction from weaker conviction, lower purchasing power or a shift to other venues.[3]

Capital markets provide a partial offset. Trade frequency rose and the reconstructed aggregate amount was comparatively stable. Yet lower ticket sizes and lower AUA per account show that the enlarged user base was not translating into equal capital depth. Customer acquisition and customer monetisation were moving at different speeds.[2][3]

The adversarial test rules out a customer-exit claim

Crypto trade count fell only 4%, so the August data do not support a claim that eToro’s crypto customers abandoned the platform en masse. Nor do they establish that customers lost 71% of their holdings. The decline concerns the amount invested through trades during one month, not the value of crypto assets already held.[3][4]

A price or revenue claim would also go too far. Smaller tickets can reflect lower asset prices, cautious sizing, product mix or regional changes, and contribution depends on spreads and costs. The finding is behavioural: similar order frequency carried much less capital.[1][3]

August was preliminary and unaudited. A later correction or the full quarter can refine the figures. The appropriate test is persistence across September and the quarterly filing, not extrapolation from one month into a permanent trend.[3]

The acquisition-adjusted account picture remains strong

Removing the 110,000 acquired Zengo and Bit2C accounts does not reverse the funded-account growth. The adjusted count of about 4.25 million remains approximately 560,000 above the prior-year 3.69 million. Organic and other growth therefore explain most of the increase.[3]

The distinction matters because acquired accounts can bring different balances and activity profiles. A lower AUA per account may partly reflect adding crypto-focused or lower-balance relationships through acquisitions. Cohort disclosure would show whether those accounts mature differently from users acquired through the core platform.[3]

Even on the adjusted denominator, the average AUA and invested amount per relationship declined. The central finding therefore survives the acquisition effect: eToro expanded the relationship base faster than the capital deployed through it.[3]

A multi-month view shows August was not simply July repeated

July had only 1.4 million crypto trades at an average $182, while August had 5.3 million trades at $97. Aggregate invested amount therefore rebounded from about $255 million to $514 million month on month even as average ticket size nearly halved. The two months reached weak year-on-year outcomes through different combinations of frequency and size.[2][3][4]

That volatility argues against extrapolating a single monthly mechanism. July’s contraction was dominated by trade count; August’s was dominated by ticket size. The persistent element was lower capital committed to crypto relative to the prior year, not a stable pattern in how the decline occurred.[3][4]

A quarterly reconstruction using all three monthly files would be more robust, but the public series currently makes August the latest fully disclosed month. The next monthly and quarterly releases should show whether ticket size recovered or whether smaller crypto positions became the new norm.[3][4]

The next results should connect activity with contribution

The most useful disclosure would pair monthly trade counts and invested amounts with net contribution by asset class and active-customer cohorts. That would show whether smaller crypto tickets carry different spreads, whether new accounts mature into larger balances and whether acquisitions change the economics of the average relationship.[1][3]

The defensible finding is narrower than a crypto-exit narrative. eToro’s customers made nearly as many crypto trades in August as a year earlier, but the average investment was 70% smaller, producing an implied 71% fall in aggregate invested amount. At the same time, funded accounts grew 18% and capital-markets trades rose 31%. The platform was not losing all activity; it was processing a markedly smaller amount of capital through each crypto decision.[3][4]

Report an error or submit an update