Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

ESMA’s MIDAS manual specifies fortnightly crypto-data submissions and validation

The 21 October instructions define different execution and order-book datasets, phased collection and a separate onboarding process.

ESMA’s 21 October MIDAS instructions provide operational details for centralised crypto-market surveillance. The manual describes data submitted in response to competent-authority requests under the MiCA framework, rather than announcing a new licence or transferring national supervisory responsibility to ESMA.[1]

At a glance01

Submission scope and workflow

Submission scope and workflow
AreaInstruction
Trading-platform CASPsExecution records (auth.117), including both buy and sell legs where applicable, plus pre-trade order-book records (auth.118)Source 1
Other CASPsExecution records (auth.117), with the relevant buy or sell leg per recordSource 1
FrequencyEvery two weeks; alternatives require agreement with the provider and national authoritiesSource 1
Transport and formatDedicated SFTP; plain-text UTF-8 JSONSource 1
File limit500 MB; split larger datasets into partsSource 1
Local validationPre-validate mandatory fields and datatypes against the supplied JSON schemaSource 1
ValidationTransmission, file and content checksSource 1
OnboardingSeparate test and production endpoints, with test files before productionSource 1

The first phase uses a limited subset of data rather than the full MiCA record-keeping inventory. It excludes personal identifiers and specified supervisory or investigative data. Feedback files identify validation findings, requiring firms to distinguish successful transmission from accepted content and correct rejected submissions.[1]

Filename validation is also substantive: the prescribed pattern identifies the dataset type, the record date and the part number out of the total parts. A malformed filename can be rejected before business-content checks. The first-phase exclusions do not abolish the wider MiCA record-keeping obligations; they limit what this initial MIDAS collection receives.[1]

Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

Report an error or submit an update