EquiLend and Cboe agree securities-lending clearing connection

EquiLend and Cboe Clear Europe have agreed to connect the NGT trading platform and EquiLend’s post-trade systems to Cboe’s securities-financing clearing service. Announced on 8 October, the integration would give clients a route to the central counterparty through their existing provider, avoiding a separate direct technology connection.[1]

The design offers two submission points: when a trade is agreed on NGT, or afterwards through the post-trade workflow. Each side can submit through its preferred channel, with Cboe’s matching engine reconciling the submissions. The announcement describes a planned integration and gives no activation date.[1]

A common counterparty and settlement workflow

Cboe’s service places the clearing house between lending counterparties and manages the loan through its lifecycle. Its published design includes settlement instructions involving securities depositories and settlement agents, daily reconciliation, valuation and regulatory reporting. That moves the connection beyond passing an execution message: the parties must also process the outstanding loan and its subsequent changes.[3]

The clearing house also describes margin offsets across cash equities, derivatives and securities financing. Their value to a participant depends on the positions that can actually be offset; a new connection alone says little about an individual desk’s capital or collateral saving.[3]

Cboe’s separate 7 October announcement scheduled an expansion into US equities for mid-October. Initial coverage would comprise Russell 3000 stocks and the top 500 US-listed ETFs, with settlement at DTC through BNY. Clearing those US loans would initially be available only to non-US lenders and borrowers.[2]

The service began with European equities and ETFs in 2025 and added fixed-income instruments in August 2026. Cboe reported €14 billion of outstanding loans during September, a measure of positions still open. It also offers a special clearing-member route through which beneficial-owner lenders, including pension funds and UCITS, can participate without margin or default-fund contributions. That concession applies to the specified lender model.[2]

For EquiLend users, provider choice is a practical part of the proposed connection. One counterparty can use EquiLend even if the other chooses a different submission channel. That gives desks a way to adopt clearing while retaining different technology suppliers on opposite sides of the loan.[1]

Report an error or submit an update