Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

DTCC survey finds 68% of European firms still use manual trade matching ahead of T+1

New DTCC and ValueExchange research finds settlement workloads rising faster than operational automation. The survey reports persistent manual matching and fragmented settlement instructions as the October 2027 T+1 change approaches.

DTCC and ValueExchange reported persistent manual post-trade processes in research announced on 21 October. Their findings arrive ahead of two separate EU deadlines: new allocation and confirmation requirements in December 2026 and the move to T+1 settlement in October 2027.[1][2]

At a glance01

Reported operational indicators

Reported operational indicators
ItemDetails
2025 settlement volumesUp 15%Source 1
Number of failed tradesUp 21%Source 1
Manual trade matching68% of firms retain some manual processingSource 1
Automated SSI storage and exchange33% of European middle offices investedSource 1
Place-of-settlement readiness62% appear preparedSource 1

The increase in failed trades is not a 21% failure rate. The survey percentages also describe firms or middle offices, rather than the share of every European trade processed manually. These distinctions matter when comparing the findings with an individual broker’s own operational data.[1]

At a glance02

ESMA implementation timetable

ESMA implementation timetable
ItemDetails
7 December 2026Standardised electronic, machine-readable allocations and confirmations; limited technical-disruption exceptionSource 2
11 October 2027EU standard securities settlement cycle changes to T+1Source 2

Where the remaining time can disappear

A missing standing settlement instruction can turn an otherwise valid trade into a sequence of messages between broker, asset manager and custodian. Shortening the cycle removes time from that repair process. An internal system may be automated while the handoff to a counterparty remains manual, so readiness has to be measured across the chain.[1][2]

Useful operational measures include first-pass matching, rejected instructions, unresolved exceptions and the time needed to obtain missing cash or securities. Those measures can identify a recurring bottleneck without mistaking an industry survey average for a firm-specific compliance finding.[1][2]

Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

  1. One year to go for T+1 settlement: the regulatory framework is complete European Securities and Markets Authority · 16 Oct 2026 · Accessed 27 Oct 2026

Report an error or submit an update