CME posts record Q3 revenue as more trading offsets lower revenue per contract

CME Group reported $1.7373 billion of third-quarter revenue on 21 October, up 13.0% from a year earlier. Its average futures-and-options revenue per contract fell, illustrating why an exchange can earn more while collecting less on the average contract.[1]

Transaction-fee revenue rose 12.2%, while market-data revenue increased 20.0%. These are calculations from the reported figures. The latter contributed $40.6 million of the $199.7 million revenue increase, giving the results a second growth source beyond trading fees.[1]

Volume is only one part of the fee equation

CME’s fee documentation describes several determinants of the amount charged: product, membership or incentive-programme status, volume, venue and transaction type. An average rate therefore combines trades with different economics. A change in that average cannot be read directly as a general tariff cut, or as the price a particular broker pays for every order.[4]

That distinction matters commercially. A distributor evaluating a futures offering needs the fee schedule for its actual products and customer arrangements. Applying the group-wide average to every proposed contract would replace the relevant tariff with a blended accounting outcome. CME’s current fee page also identifies changes effective 1 October: those belong to the subsequent quarter, after the September reporting period.[4]

Rates, FX and smaller contracts broaden the activity base

The separate operating report puts third-quarter average daily volume at 29.4 million contracts, 16% above the year-earlier period. Interest-rate activity averaged 15.1 million contracts a day, while equity-index products averaged 7.7 million. FX averaged 988,000 contracts, up 19%, including Japanese-yen futures growth of 49%. These are contract counts, rather than dollar turnover or a count of customers.[2]

Smaller contracts were a conspicuous part of the mix. Micro E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures averaged 2.6 million contracts daily in the quarter, up 101%; Micro WTI averaged 190,000, up 238%. In September alone, micro equity-index products represented 45% of equity-index volume and micro metals 53% of metals volume. The monthly shares should not be mistaken for quarterly shares, but they show why nominal contract growth requires a product-size explanation.[2]

International distribution contributes a substantial share

CME’s geographical report recorded 9 million contracts of non-US daily volume in the quarter, up 22%. EMEA accounted for 6.5 million and Asia-Pacific for 2.1 million; their growth rates were 20% and 28%, respectively. Non-US activity was therefore about 31% of total daily volume, calculated from the company’s rounded 9 million and 29.4 million figures.[3]

The geographical breadth is relevant to brokers serving clients outside US hours and to technology firms connecting those clients to listed derivatives. However, regional volume totals describe where activity is reported; they do not provide an intraday liquidity map. Establishing the depth available to a specific order still requires the contract and trading session, alongside the fee terms applicable to the participant.[3][4]

Report an error or submit an update