Bullish brings BTC options positions into Elwood portfolio workflows

Bullish said on 12 October that its BTC options trades and market data were available inside Elwood Technologies’ portfolio management system. Mutual customers can fetch completed trades for automatic booking or reconciliation and value options alongside their other positions. The announcement identifies Bullish (GI) Limited as the options venue.[1]

The connection can shorten the path from an execution to a portfolio that trading, risk and operations teams can use consistently. Options require more than a signed quantity: a wrong strike, expiry or option type can distort the hedge a desk believes it holds.[1][2]

Bullish describes the Gibraltar derivatives offering as available to eligible institutional clients in more than 20 jurisdictions, with access through onboarding to Bullish GI. The connection is therefore for an admitted exchange customer that also uses Elwood; it does not establish that every customer of a Bullish group entity has derivatives access.[3]

A trade record becomes an operating position

Elwood’s PMS maintains an investment book of record across trades, positions, movements and equity. Its published design accepts venue and execution-system feeds, programmatic trade submissions and manual bookings into one data model. That common record then feeds valuation, profit and loss, exposure analysis and reconciliation.[2]

The public Bullish options-ladder API supplies prices, implied volatilities and Greeks such as delta, gamma, theta and vega. The private trade endpoint requires an authorization token and supports paginated retrieval. These are different data channels: market information can inform valuation, while account-specific records establish which trades belong in the portfolio.[4][5]

Data access and dealing authority need separate treatment

Bullish’s API documentation distinguishes HMAC keys, which authenticate trading endpoints, from ECDSA keys that can sign trading and custody requests. It also describes optional IP allowlists and sessions that expire after 24 hours. The Elwood announcement does not publish the connector’s credential scopes or claim a new ability to execute options orders or withdraw assets through the PMS.[6][1]

A post-trade connection should be assessed against the actual permissions granted to the integration, rather than labelled read-only merely because its business purpose is reporting. Operations teams need both a reliable record of fills and a clear distinction between ingesting an execution and authorizing another transaction.[6][5]

Hourly settlement makes cash part of the reconciliation

Bullish’s portfolio-margin documentation says all its derivatives, including options, use futures-style margining: profit and loss is marked to market and settled in USDC each hour. Account equity includes collateral and unsettled profit and loss, less liabilities. Its stress-based methodology permits offsets between instruments sharing an underlying asset, while excluding cross-asset netting.[7]

The expiry guide says in-the-money options expire through the corresponding dated future. Its worked example assumes no pre-existing position in that future: after the official expiry price arrives, the remaining option profit or loss moves into a new futures record with zero quantity and notional, followed by USDC settlement and removal of that record. Existing futures positions can change the netting treatment. A disappearing option alone therefore does not establish that the cash movements have finished.[8]

Illustrative accounting example: suppose an hourly settlement credits 4,000 USDC to a desk’s cash balance and removes the same 4,000 USDC from unsettled profit. With no other change, total equity is unchanged. Counting the cash credit while retaining the old unsettled-profit figure would overstate equity by 4,000 USDC. This is an example of the reconciliation problem, not a report of an Elwood or Bullish error.[7]

A consolidated portfolio view can help a desk see a hedge distributed across venues. Financing that hedge still requires attention to where collateral is held and to each exchange’s margin and settlement rules. Better information can change trading decisions without itself moving collateral.[7][2]

Report an error or submit an update