Banca Finnat adds Bloomberg order and risk systems to support its treasury business

Banca Finnat Euramerica has adopted Bloomberg’s TOMS order-management and MARS risk systems for its treasury and trading operations. The 21 October announcement, reported by FX News Group, extends the bank’s existing Bloomberg Terminal relationship into the management of positions, profit and loss, orders and risk.[1]

The stated objective is a common real-time view as the bank expands treasury and market-making activity. Chief executive Arturo Nattino linked the decision to that expansion. No implementation price, quantified cost saving or measured change in execution quality was disclosed in the reported announcement, so the commercial outcome remains a stated operational improvement rather than a demonstrated return on the investment.[1]

Why the two systems perform different jobs

Bloomberg describes TOMS as a hosted platform spanning trade capture, inventory and operational workflows, with connectivity for electronic and voice trading. Its modules cover cash instruments and listed and over-the-counter derivatives. For FX, the documentation specifies spot, forwards, options and structured products; for rates, it describes positions, pricing, interest-rate risk and profit-and-loss management.[2]

These capabilities explain the order-management side of the decision. A treasury desk needs a dependable account of what it owns and what it has traded before it can manage the resulting exposure. TOMS is designed to connect those records with subsequent processing across trading and operations. The supplier’s broad product catalogue should not be treated as a list of every module Finnat has bought.[2]

MARS supplies valuation and risk calculations, including pre-trade and post-trade portfolio analysis, scenarios and stress testing. Bloomberg makes the system accessible through the Terminal and an API. For the API, its documentation describes a common market-data snapshot for portfolio calculations, connecting positions, prices and models so that users can work from a consistent valuation basis.[3]

The practical importance of that consistency is straightforward: two teams can disagree about a portfolio because they are looking at different positions, different market prices or different models. Joining trade records to a common calculation environment is intended to reduce those reconciliation gaps. It still requires the bank to choose and govern its inputs, models and limits; buying a risk system does not make those decisions disappear.[3]

The bank’s existing business explains the operational need

Finnat’s own institutional-services description covers brokerage in shares, bonds and derivatives, large orders handled by dedicated desks and order flows collected from banking networks. It also offers liquidity-support and corporate-broking services to issuers, alongside research and sales activity directed at institutional investors.[4]

That combination gives the technology decision a more specific context than a general software refresh. Handling customer flow, maintaining trading inventory and supporting issuer liquidity place different demands on the same operating organisation. The relevant implementation question is whether those activities can share reliable position and risk information while retaining their distinct responsibilities.[4]

The reported adoption establishes a move deeper into Bloomberg’s operational systems. Evidence of the next commercial step would be a disclosed improvement in processing, risk-reporting speed or operating costs; the announcement supplies no numerical baseline against which to judge those outcomes.[1]

Report an error or submit an update