Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

Alpaca gains ADGM in-principle approval but cannot yet start regulated brokerage or custody

Alpaca Clearing & Custody ME has an in-principle FSRA approval for its application in Abu Dhabi Global Market. Virtual-asset brokerage and custody are proposed, not yet authorised services; full permission and conditions remain outstanding.

Alpaca announced on 25 October that Alpaca Clearing & Custody ME Ltd had received in-principle approval from the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Abu Dhabi Global Market. The proposed regional business would offer brokerage infrastructure and virtual-asset custody, subject to a final Financial Services Permission and the activities it permits.[1]

At a glance01

Authorisation milestones

Authorisation milestones
ItemDetails
ApplicantAlpaca Clearing & Custody ME LtdSource 1
Decision announced25 October 2026Source 1
StatusIn-principle approval; regulated activities cannot begin on this basisSource 1
Next requirementSatisfy FSRA conditions and obtain a Financial Services PermissionSource 1

What this changes for potential partners

The announcement gives banks, brokers and fintech firms a named regional applicant around which to plan discussions. It does not yet supply the legal basis for onboarding customers to an ADGM regulated service. An integration timetable should therefore distinguish technical preparation from the date on which the authorised entity can actually accept business.[1]

That distinction also determines which documents a prospective partner needs. Commercial presentations describe the intended service; the eventual permission establishes permitted activities; the client and custody agreements allocate responsibility for money, assets and operational failures. These documents answer different questions. A group’s existing overseas business cannot establish the scope of its proposed UAE subsidiary.[1]

For implementation planning, the decisive next evidence will be the final permission, the contracting entity named in the service agreement and the custody arrangements for supported assets. Until those are available, any launch date or coverage commitment would be premature.[1]

Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

Report an error or submit an update