B2BROKER: broker software, liquidity bundles and operating costs

B2BROKER supplies several layers of a brokerage business: the customer portal and back office, trading software, copy-trading infrastructure, liquidity connectivity and institutional dealing relationships. Its broad catalogue makes the composition of a purchase important. A broker can buy operational software, combine selected products, or engage for liquidity; those routes create different technical dependencies, invoices and legal counterparties. The company markets the stack to FX, CFD and crypto businesses as well as financial institutions.[1]

The practical distinction is between replacing the client-facing operating system and adding one capability to an existing brokerage. Adding a copy module can preserve the trading platform while changing account permissions and investment workflows. Replacing the CRM changes the records used by onboarding, finance and partner teams. Buying liquidity also introduces an execution counterparty and collateral relationship. These are separate decisions even when commercial packaging brings them together.

B2CORE’s product material lists connections to MetaTrader 4 and 5, cTrader, B2TRADER, DXtrade, Match-Trader and TradeLocker, together with bridge and liquidity infrastructure. It also presents multi-level introducing-broker rewards, transaction administration, client permissions, logs and reporting. A displayed integration establishes a documented connection option; it does not establish that every feature, platform version or commercial licence is included in every subscription.[6]

B2CONNECT documents connection monitoring, log inspection, reporting exports and email or Slack alerts. These functions help an operator distinguish a disconnected maker, a routing decision and an execution result. They do not turn a connection into a credit line, or ensure that a price visible on a screen is executable for the required amount. For a mixed FX and crypto deployment, the funding model at each maker remains part of the architecture.[10]

Pricing is mixed: several software subscriptions have public rates, while liquidity terms, configurations and some services require a commercial offer. The overview advertises B2TRADER from USD 2,500 per month. A starting subscription is not an all-in brokerage budget: platform licensing, payment processing, market data, extra environments and external suppliers can create separate charges.[4]

The direct B2CORE pricing page states a three-month minimum commitment and a 15% annual-prepayment discount on subscriptions. Advanced adds IB functionality; Growth adds the Back Office API; Pro adds multiple brands/domains. Dedicated account management appears in the Pro and Enterprise columns. Branded mobile applications carry a USD 1,000 one-time charge per app/platform. These plan distinctions matter when comparing a portal-only launch with a brokerage requiring custom finance integrations.[7]

The AWS Marketplace route instead displays one-month contracts, with included monthly deposit volumes of USD 100,000, 333,333, 1 million, 4 million and 20 million for the five corresponding tiers. Its usage charges apply above those thresholds, and it flags possible additional AWS infrastructure costs. The one-month marketplace term and direct three-month minimum should therefore remain route-specific. They should not be merged into a single universal contract term.[8]

B2COPY includes managed hosting, updates, monitoring and support. Unused volume does not roll over; an additional trading server adds USD 1,000 per month. Standard introduces multi-server and multi-platform copying, extended APIs and removal of footer branding; Enterprise adds full API access, custom development and an on-premises option. The published Standard example is USD 3,250 at 2 billion monthly volume: USD 2,500 plus 500 additional millions at USD 1.50.[12]

The detailed liquidity-bundle rules calculate the core invoice as the greater of eligible A-book commissions and the bundle minimum, then add excluded charges. Selected eligible base subscriptions set that minimum; external-LP flow does not generate the same credit. Processing overages, copied-volume overages, B/C-book charges and vendor extras can remain payable. The minimum starts with the first billing cycle. Consequently, a subscription offset reduces one cost component while retaining a minimum commercial commitment.[5]

For illustration, an agreed USD 6,500 minimum with USD 4,000 eligible commissions still produces USD 6,500 before extras; at USD 8,000 commissions, the base becomes USD 8,000. These are arithmetic examples, not quoted offers.[5]

B2COPY’s standalone pricing page also mentions a bundle minimum starting at USD 5,000. That qualification needs to be reconciled with the selected-subscription formula in the accepted order.[12]

B2TRADER describes a staged launch: initial provisioning, liquidity and instrument configuration, then branding and workflows over an advertised first week. That describes the vendor’s technical sequence. It does not establish a completed licence application, payment relationship or live operational acceptance. Instrument definitions, margin currency, fees and reconciliation have to agree across the front end, dealing system and customer ledger before migration is meaningful.[9]

For an existing broker, the difficult migration boundary is often identity and balance continuity. Client IDs, trading-account IDs, referral trees and unsettled withdrawals can refer to the same person in different systems. A migration plan should establish which system is authoritative at cutover and how pre-existing instructions finish. This is an architectural implication of combining portal, trading and copy systems, not a published promise that every historical record migrates automatically.

The marketplace vendor policy says subscriptions are billed in advance and generally non-refundable except where law requires otherwise. It asks for invoice disputes within 14 days, with the order ID and tenant name; approved refunds are processed through the marketplace within 30 days. This billing route is separate from the general website complaint procedure.[8]

The website procedure requests the grievance, supporting correspondence and proposed resolution. It states a one-day submission window after the grievance and a reply within two weeks. Those are published procedural terms, not a finding about enforceability or the rights available under a particular financial-service agreement. For an execution incident, the responsible liquidity entity and its contractual complaint route matter as much as the brand-level contact.[16]

The legal notice explicitly describes B2BROKER as a trademark rather than a legal entity. Software Technologies Limited, Hong Kong registration 2585284, distributes the SaaS and trading technology and says it does not provide financial services. Liquidity and related financial services are assigned to B2BROKER PRIME INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED, Labuan registration LL20661. Engagement requires an agreement with the relevant company and the applicable onboarding checks.[2]

The Labuan Financial Services Authority’s March 2026 published bank and investment-bank list identifies B2Broker Prime Investment Bank Ltd., formerly B2B Capital Investment Bank Ltd., under licence 240153BI. That independently supports the named entity and licence in that dated list. It does not establish that Software Technologies Limited holds the permission, or that every product displayed under B2BROKER has the same legal treatment.[3]

The group AML webpage describes identification and source-of-funds checks, corporate ownership documentation and restrictions on third-party withdrawals. It also says individual companies may apply supplementary policies. This distinction is material for a buyer acquiring both software and liquidity: supplying an AML workflow in the CRM does not assume responsibility for the broker’s own customer classification, sanctions decisions or licensing.[17]

B2BROKER dates its origins to 2014, initially supplying brokerage technology including MetaTrader white labels and its own CRM. Its history describes expansion into crypto services, then development of B2COPY, B2CONNECT and B2TRADER. That progression explains the current combination of operational software, execution infrastructure and liquidity packaging. The website’s network-wide licence and office counts are not treated here as a consolidated permission map or audited scale measure.[19]

The relationship between products is clearer than the public ownership picture. The legal page identifies service distributors, while the history page describes the wider business. Neither reviewed document supplies a complete current beneficial-ownership chart. A procurement record should therefore use the actual software and financial-service counterparties rather than treating the trademark as the contracting party.[2][19]

Operator

Software Technologies Limited for SaaS; B2BROKER PRIME INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED for liquidity

Service scope

Broker technology, client operations, trading, copy trading, connectivity and institutional liquidity, with separate technology and financial-service contracts.

Customer types

FX and CFD brokers; Crypto brokers and exchanges; Banks and financial institutions; Proprietary trading businesses

Delivery

SaaS; Hosted; API; Managed service; On premises

Pricing publication

Public and quoted pricing

Platforms

B2TRADER; B2CORE; B2COPY; B2CONNECT

Implementation

Product-specific provisioning and integration; B2COPY publishes platform-access, domain, branding and monitoring requirements. Enterprise B2COPY advertises an on-premises option.

Support

Product-specific technical support. B2CORE’s marketplace listing publishes a 24/7 helpdesk; support entitlements and account-management tiers differ.

Permissions and regulatory scope

B2BROKER is a trademark. The software distributor does not provide financial services. Labuan’s March 2026 official list names the separate liquidity entity under licence 240153BI. No group-wide permission or retail protection is inferred.

Provider metadata checked 20 Oct 2026Source 2Source 3Source 1Source 12Source 13Source 8

B2TRADER also advertises configurable permissions for external AI/MCP access, including disabled, read-only and trading-capable modes. The important operating distinction is the authority granted to an integration. Market analysis, account reading and order submission have different consequences, so approval and audit arrangements should follow the enabled action rather than the label applied to the assistant.[9]

For recurring cost comparisons, deposited funds, copied trading activity and eligible externally hedged flow should remain separate model inputs. One deposit can support many transactions. Copying a transaction does not determine its eventual hedge. Combining these quantities into a single volume assumption can therefore misstate the bill. This is an implication of the distinct pricing measures above, rather than an additional fee rule.