Skip to content
Broker news. Connected. RSS feed
FXBROKERS

A clearer view of the broker industry.

Crypto ExchangesExchange profile

Stargate: capped OFT fees, Taxi transfers and October asset-support deadlines

Stargate cross-chain transfers after the September fee change and October Taxi migration. Includes capped OFT charges and already-passed 23 October asset-support deadlines.

By FXBrokers Research DeskOperating status: ActivePublished Updated Sources checked
  • Cross-chain native/OFT asset movement and supported swap-like transfers using Stargate liquidity pools and LayerZero messaging. Not a conventional fiat-funded central limit-order book.
  • Effective September 2026, certain Stargate app OFT transfers incur up to 2bps capped at $250, separate from LayerZero executor fees and gas; app quote varies by protocol route. Taxi route replaced Bus from Oct 1.
  • LayerZero/Stargate smart-contract transfer infrastructure; not established as a regulated bank deposit or a universally licensed centralized crypto exchange. No matched financial authorisation number asserted.

Stargate Finance — Cross-chain native/OFT asset movement and supported swap-like transfers using Stargate liquidity pools and LayerZero messaging. Not a conventional fiat-funded central limit-order book.[1][2][3]

Reference table01

At a glance — how this service actually operates

At a glance — how this service actually operates
AspectPublicly documented position
Operating modeldecentralised / Cross-chain native/OFT asset movement and supported swap-like transfers using Stargate liquidity pools and LayerZero messaging. Not a conventional fiat-funded central limit-order book.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5
Client audienceretail, professional, institutional; Compatible wallet, chain, token, source/destination liquidity and applicable route. Stargate V2 support ended for the named chains on 23 October 2026 under the published bulletin; do not infer all displayed networks remain available.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5
Principal chargesEffective September 2026, certain Stargate app OFT transfers incur up to 2bps capped at $250, separate from LayerZero executor fees and gas; app quote varies by protocol route. Taxi route replaced Bus from Oct 1.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5
Funds/asset handlingWallet-connected blockchain smart contracts including liquidity pools, Hydra lock/mint representations and cross-chain messaging. Asset value and smart-contract security depend on involved chains/LayerZero verification.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5
Regulatory pictureLayerZero/Stargate smart-contract transfer infrastructure; not established as a regulated bank deposit or a universally licensed centralized crypto exchange. No matched financial authorisation number asserted.Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5

Native-asset routing, Hydra and LayerZero messaging

Sections ↑

Stargate is a cross-chain liquidity transport protocol with token swap/transfer functionality. It uses pool liquidity and cross-chain messaging to move a supported asset across separate networks or into a supported alternate representation. Its current V2 architecture includes core unified liquidity and a Hydra mechanism in which a native asset may be locked in a core pool while a mapped omnichain representation is minted on a destination chain. This is technically different from buying Bitcoin against a bank deposit or resting an order on a single central exchange order book.[5][4][3][9]

The route UI must specify both the token identity and source/destination networks; onchain swaps depend on exact chain/asset combinations, liquidity, current contract state and messaging security. Stargate’s technical docs discuss a protocol built on LayerZero and pool balancing through credit-allocation mechanisms. For an end user, the practical output is the quantity and type of token deliverable at the destination, not a generic coin balance guaranteed in fiat. The same token ticker across chains may represent a native coin, wrapped token or Hydra-issued asset with very different redemption and smart-contract exposures.[5][4][3][9]

Reference table02

Main Stargate transfer mechanisms

Main Stargate transfer mechanisms
MechanismHow it worksRisk to understand
Core-pool transferLocks/unlocks supported native liquidity across chainsPool/route capacity and smart-contract risk.Source 5Source 4Source 3Source 2
Hydra assetLocks core liquidity and mints OFT on a satellite chainToken representation and redeemability.Source 5Source 4Source 3Source 2
OFT transferMove omnichain token through messagingLayerZero endpoint verification and executor fees.Source 5Source 4Source 3Source 2
Supported cross-token routeSwap native assets through applicable pathwayVariable price impact and gas.Source 5Source 4Source 3Source 2
Public dashboardShows historical transfers/poolsMetrics do not guarantee current liquidity.Source 5Source 4Source 3Source 2
Reference table03

Operational changes effective in 2026

Operational changes effective in 2026
DateChangeCurrent treatment
1 SeptemberOFT interface charge introducedUp to 2 bps, capped at $250.Source 6Source 7Source 8
1 OctoberTaxi becomes the delivery modeBus batching is historical.Source 6Source 7Source 8
23 OctoberSpecific Stargate asset exits listed for Gravity/Camp/GOAT/MetisDeadline has already passed at this review.Source 6Source 7Source 8
15 DecemberPublished STG→ZRO conversion deadlineDo not assume conversion after that date.Source 6Source 7Source 8

OFT charges, executor expenses and route quote

Sections ↑

LayerZero’s August 11, 2026 fee announcement states that OFT transfers through the Stargate app carry up to two basis points from September 1, capped at $250 per transfer. Two basis points is 0.02%, so an eligible $10,000 transfer at the maximum 2bps component implies $2 before other costs. However, this figure applies to the named OFT transfer charge and route, not every native-pool or cross-token transaction. The same update separately described a LayerZero Labs Executor fee minimum of $0.25, with chain gas and other protocol costs potentially additional.[6][7][3]

The source-chain transaction requires its own gas, and the bridge route may expose the sender to pool fees, destination gas arrangements, token-conversion ratios and changing quote conditions. Old user documentation describes Stargate Bus batching as a cheap option, but the September operational update ended Bus deliveries from October 1, moving transactions to Taxi only. A 2025 Bus-versus-Taxi cost comparison is therefore not appropriate for this October service profile. Avoid quoting outdated fixed 0.06% averages as the current universal charge.[6][7][3]

Reference table04

Stargate pricing and service changes

Stargate pricing and service changes
Effective datePublished changePractical result
1 Sep 2026Stargate app OFT charge up to 2bps, capped $250Route specific; not the whole final cost.Source 6Source 7Source 8
1 Sep 2026LayerZero executor minimum $0.25Separate transport/execution component.Source 6Source 7Source 8
1 Oct 2026Stargate Bus batch delivery discontinuedTaxi becomes delivery method.Source 6Source 7Source 8
23 Oct 2026Named route deprecations take effectUrgent asset/LP migration risk on affected chains.Source 6Source 7Source 8
Reference table05

All-in cross-chain transfer economics

All-in cross-chain transfer economics
ComponentPotential impactHow to verify
Native pool feeAmount/route-dependentLive Stargate quote.Source 3Source 6Source 4
OFT platform feeUp to 2bps for covered app transfersIs transfer of covered type?Source 3Source 6Source 4
Executor chargeDelivery/messaging costQuote and underlying route.Source 3Source 6Source 4
Network gasSource signature and possible destinationWallet gas and chain condition.Source 3Source 6Source 4
Bridged token marketabilityRepresentation may differ from native assetTarget token contract and redemption route.Source 3Source 6Source 4
Reference table06

OFT interface fee example: separate from executor cost

OFT interface fee example: separate from executor cost
Transfer value2 bps before capInterface charge at stated maximum
$1,000$0.20$0.20Source 6
$100,000$20$20Source 6
$1,250,000$250$250Source 6
$2,000,000$400$250 capSource 6
Reference table07

Fee layers with different scopes

Fee layers with different scopes
ChargeScopeDo not generalise to
OFT interface feeOFT transfers initiated through StargateAll OFT transfers elsewhere.Source 6
Executor minimumSeparate minimum $0.25 disclosedThe complete transaction cost.Source 6
Protocol pool chargesRoute/pool economicsA governance-wide fee switch.Source 6

Token network, destination assets and finality

Sections ↑

Stargate has no universal local bank deposit account for customers. The user holds tokens on the source chain, connects a wallet, requests a quote with an explicit destination chain and signs the required onchain operation. Depending on the route, the source may lock a native asset in a liquidity pool and release assets elsewhere or mint/burn an omnichain representation. Wallet gas is needed for the source transaction; the destination may involve its own verification and relayer/executor steps before the asset becomes spendable.[3][4][8]

A confirmed send on the source chain is not proof that the destination has completed. Track the source hash and the LayerZero/Stargate message until delivered and inspect the target asset contract. The revised support bulletin set 23 October asset-support deadlines for certain chains. Those dates have passed as of this review; an old supported-route screenshot does not establish that a late exit remains available.[3][4][8]

Reference table08

Source-to-destination execution

Source-to-destination execution
EventStatus and proofWhere failure arises
Wallet approvalSource chain token allowanceMalicious router or unlimited allowance.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Send from sourceTransaction hash / pool lockWrong chain or insufficient gas.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Cross-chain messageLayerZero delivery statusVerifier/relayer/executor issue.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Release/mint targetDestination chain transaction hashLiquidity or token representation.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Use token at destinationCorrect native/OFT assetDepeg, wrapped-token or chain support issue.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Route deprecationConfirm date and supported assetsAsset can become stranded.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Reference table09

Late-October support dates: two different deadlines

Late-October support dates: two different deadlines
ChainStargate asset dateOff-chain-service date
Gravity23 October 202630 October 2026Source 8
Camp23 October 202630 October 2026Source 8
GOAT23 October 202630 October 2026Source 8
Metis23 October 202630 October 2026Source 8
LiskNo Stargate-specific asset instruction in notice30 October 2026Source 8

Pool contracts, Hydra representation and protocol security

Sections ↑

Stargate is wallet-connected, but user funds are not necessarily under individual wallet control for the entire transfer. The protocol may lock a token in a pooled smart contract while a destination asset is created or released. Unified liquidity pools rely on allocation and redemption mechanics; an OFT representation has token contract and cross-chain backing assumptions. A wallet owner must distinguish successful message finality from the economic claim represented by the received token. This is an infrastructure contract risk rather than the private balance sheet of a conventional centralized exchange.[3][4][8]

Cross-chain dependencies include contract security, message verification under LayerZero, destination chain liveness, relay costs, bridge liquidity and token issuer restrictions. A deprecation of a satellite chain can create a real withdrawal deadline for Hydra or liquidity-provider positions even if the token still appears in a wallet. The documented deadline is an operating constraint, not evidence of a full protocol shutdown. Core networks such as Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base and BNB Chain are identified as deeper-liquidity migration destinations in the bulletin, but route and asset availability require a current check.[3][4][8]

Reference table10

Where assets and risk sit

Where assets and risk sit
LayerEconomic/technical roleFailure scenario
Source self-custodial walletSigns sendPhishing / mistaken token.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Stargate liquidity poolLocks/allocates supported assetContract/pool insolvency or halt.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Hydra OFT supplyRepresents claim to pooled liquidityAsset representation/redemption issue.Source 3Source 4Source 8
LayerZero transportProof/message coordinationMisdelivery or delayed verification.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Destination contractMints/releases payout tokenWrong network or asset contract.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Deprecated satellite routeLiquidity may need migrationAccess loss after effective cutoff.Source 3Source 4Source 8
Reference table11

Asset type determines the migration problem

Asset type determines the migration problem
HoldingTechnical exposureRecord to identify
Hydra tokenRepresentation backed through route infrastructureChain and exact token contract.Source 4Source 8Source 7
Pool LP tokenClaim on pool liquidityPool and underlying assets.Source 4Source 8Source 7
OFTIssuer-defined cross-chain tokenIssuer and destination representation.Source 4Source 8Source 7
STGSeparate legacy token conversionConversion transaction and current official flow.Source 4Source 8Source 7

Network support and the October deprecations

Sections ↑

Eligibility is chiefly asset, wallet and route-specific rather than based on a universal customer onboarding list. A source wallet must be able to sign on the chosen network and hold gas; the protocol must still support that pool and token. The July 24 support update named Gravity, Camp, GOAT and Metis among networks with Stargate asset-support deprecation effective October 23, 2026, with owners told to move or redeem assets before that date. Other chains in the same bulletin had earlier effective dates. The 23 October deadline had already passed by the 26 October review.[8][7]

The presence of an old quoted token price or an OFT contract is not proof of ongoing cross-chain redemption. Users holding specific Hydra assets or pool LP positions may need a migration transaction, and those who miss a cutoff can lose access to the related funds. Conversely, these scheduled deprecations do not mean all Stargate services end. Users should rely on the latest LayerZero and Stargate support announcements and the live route screen, not a scraped static “30+ chains” claim, to decide whether the desired path works.[8][7]

Reference table12

Selected Stargate V2 network support changes

Selected Stargate V2 network support changes
Affected networkEffective Stargate cutoffUser implication
Gravity23 Oct 2026Published pre-cutoff instruction: redeem/bridge impacted USDC.e/Hydra assets before cutoff.Source 8
Camp23 Oct 2026Published pre-cutoff instruction: move relevant USDC.e/WETH.Source 8
GOAT23 Oct 2026Published pre-cutoff instruction: bridge impacted USDC.e/Hydra USDT/WETH.Source 8
Metis23 Oct 2026Published pre-cutoff instruction: withdraw related liquidity positions/assets.Source 8
Aurora23 Sep 2026Earlier-deprecated route, not generally open today.Source 8
Taiko/LightLink/Gnosis23 Sep 2026Earlier-deprecated routes; check assets and status.Source 8

Cross-chain message tracking and support evidence

Sections ↑

The troubleshooting starting point is the source-chain hash, exact token contract, sending and receiving networks and wallet addresses, plus the associated LayerZero message identifier when displayed. If the source token was locked but target not credited, distinguish a pending verifier/executor message from a destination token visibility problem or route that has become unsupported. A new source transfer can duplicate exposure rather than cure the original stuck message. Save the route quote and gas breakdown as well as each transaction hash.[8][3][6]

The provider’s support bulletin directs impacted users to bridge or redeem assets on affected networks. An ecosystem forum reply is not a substitute for the official signed transaction state. No worldwide guarantee of compensation for a chain deprecation, abandoned LP position or wrong token route was identified. Be especially cautious of spoofed migration websites: scammers often imitate urgent deadline announcements and request unlimited token approvals. Read the original LayerZero/Stargate destination rather than a direct-message link.[8][3][6]

Reference table13

Cross-chain incident handling

Cross-chain incident handling
ProblemEvidence requiredLikely first check
Source confirmed, destination missingSource hash, message ID, target walletLayerZero message execution state.Source 8Source 3Source 6
Wrong received tokenDestination contract and bridge routeNative versus Hydra/OFT representation.Source 8Source 3Source 6
High quote costRoute breakdown and wallet gas estimateOFT/executor/pool fees.Source 8Source 3Source 6
LP assets on deprecated chainPool token/network and cutoff dateOfficial migration instructions.Source 8Source 3Source 6
Suspicious migration requestOfficial domain and contract approvalNever share seed phrase or grant blind allowance.Source 8Source 3Source 6
Reference table14

Failed or delayed delivery: identify the stage

Failed or delayed delivery: identify the stage
StageEvidenceOperational distinction
Source transactionSource-chain hash and receiptDid the initial transfer confirm?Source 5Source 8
Cross-chain messageMessage/route statusSource confirmation is not destination delivery.Source 5Source 8
Destination executionDestination transaction or errorGas or support changes can affect completion.Source 5Source 8
Deprecated chainAsset and dated support noticeNo unconditional recovery promise.Source 5Source 8

Protocol and developer integration are not a bank licence

Sections ↑

Stargate is a smart-contract protocol involving liquidity pools, onchain tokens and cross-chain messaging, rather than an identified universal customer bank or central exchange counterparty. LayerZero’s acquisition of Stargate protocol activities in 2025 and its subsequent infrastructure announcements do not establish that the combined ecosystem holds a regulator approval to accept cash deposits or guarantee bridge redemptions everywhere. No matching financial-services permission number was established for the protocol.[3][7][5]

The rights of an asset holder depend on their wallet, token, smart contract and applicable legal jurisdiction. A business integrating cross-chain transfers may have additional compliance or custody responsibilities distinct from protocol code. LayerZero’s price schedule is a protocol-infrastructure fee notice, not a national regulatory filing. Token and chain-support withdrawals should be taken seriously regardless of whether a user believes the protocol is decentralized.[3][7][5]

Reference table15

Business/legal boundaries

Business/legal boundaries
ActivityCorrect classificationUnsupported assertion
Stargate user interfaceCross-chain transfer/swapping protocolRegulated global spot exchange.Source 3Source 7Source 5
LayerZero messagingBlockchain infrastructureBank insurance of transfers.Source 3Source 7Source 5
OFT assetsContractual/onchain token representationsAlways same as native issuer coin.Source 3Source 7Source 5
Liquidity poolsSmart contracts with shared reserve logicDeposit-taking bank.Source 3Source 7Source 5
Acquisition of StargateGroup/ecosystem ownership changeAutomatic transfer of financial permissions.Source 3Source 7Source 5

LayerZero relationship and STG-to-ZRO conversion

Sections ↑

LayerZero’s September 2026 ecosystem update says Stargate was acquired in 2025 and describes a finite conversion window for the former STG token into ZRO, ending 15 December 2026. The token transition should not be confused with closure of all Stargate bridging routes. It also reports that the old Bus transaction batch service was discontinued from October 1. These are distinctive continuing operational developments and matter for anyone using old fee guides, historical ticker labels or cached integration settings.[7][5]

Operator
Stargate protocol / LayerZero ecosystem (global contracting entity not established)
Exchange model
Decentralised
Service scope
Cross-chain native/OFT asset movement and supported swap-like transfers using Stargate liquidity pools and LayerZero messaging. Not a conventional fiat-funded central limit-order book.
Client types
Retail clients; Professional clients; Institutional clients
Pricing publication
Public and quoted pricing
Other names
Stargate Protocol; Stargate V2; Stargate
Headquarters
Decentralized multichain infrastructure
Pricing scope
Effective September 2026, certain Stargate app OFT transfers incur up to 2bps capped at $250, separate from LayerZero executor fees and gas; app quote varies by protocol route. Taxi route replaced Bus from Oct 1.
Funding scope
Supported token/network onchain sends and receives; no direct local-fiat bank account service. Requires source gas and a valid target wallet, plus route-specific limits.
Custody and asset handling
Wallet-connected blockchain smart contracts including liquidity pools, Hydra lock/mint representations and cross-chain messaging. Asset value and smart-contract security depend on involved chains/LayerZero verification.
Client eligibility
Compatible wallet, chain, token, source/destination liquidity and applicable route. Stargate V2 support ended for the named chains on 23 October 2026 under the published bulletin; do not infer all displayed networks remain available.
Support
Official project and LayerZero documentation and route status. No general bank-style payment recovery; source/destination hashes essential for incidents.
Authorisation and registration scope
LayerZero/Stargate smart-contract transfer infrastructure; not established as a regulated bank deposit or a universally licensed centralized crypto exchange. No matched financial authorisation number asserted.

Exchange metadata checked 29 Oct 2026Source 1Source 2Source 3Source 4Source 5Source 6Source 7Source 8Source 9

Example economics and deadline-focused due diligence

Sections ↑

For an OFT transfer of $10,000 eligible for the maximum 2-basis-point platform component, the illustrated Stargate app fee is $2, before LayerZero Executor and blockchain network costs. That is a straightforward rate calculation, not a real executable rate. The fee cap of $250 matters only to sufficiently large transfers and only for routes covered by that charge. A liquidity-pool transfer can have a distinct fee schedule, and a cross-token exchange can include conversion economics as well as transport charges.[6][8][7]

The affected 23 October Stargate asset deadlines are already past. Holders need current asset- and chain-specific support information; this profile does not promise a late recovery. Comparing routes still requires the exact source/target token, contract, protocol fee, messaging dependency and ultimate settlement state.[6][8][7]

Reference table16

Example OFT cost versus actual quote

Example OFT cost versus actual quote
ItemIllustration / conditionWhy it matters
Eligible $10,000 transfer × 2bps$2Maximum OFT app fee component only.Source 6Source 8Source 3
Executor minimum$0.25 announced minimumSeparate transport charge, could be higher.Source 6Source 8Source 3
Source gasDynamic by blockchainWallet pays or route includes it.Source 6Source 8Source 3
Other route feePool / relayer / token conversionDepends on exact chosen path.Source 6Source 8Source 3
Migration deadline23 Oct for selected chainsAsset access may override price concerns.Source 6Source 8Source 3
Follow the evidence

Sources & further reading

  1. Stargate transfer app and route overview Stargate Finance · Accessed 26 Oct 2026
  2. Stargate current protocol activity overview Stargate Finance · Accessed 26 Oct 2026
  3. Stargate cross-chain asset transfer architecture Stargate Finance · Accessed 22 Oct 2026
  4. Stargate V2 pooled liquidity and Hydra Stargate Finance · Accessed 22 Oct 2026
  5. Stargate official protocol introduction Stargate Finance · Accessed 22 Oct 2026
  6. LayerZero Stargate September 2026 operational update LayerZero Labs · Accessed 29 Oct 2026
  7. LayerZero Stargate route deprecations October 23 LayerZero Labs · Accessed 29 Oct 2026
  8. Stargate community native swaps and asset transfers Stargate Finance · Accessed 26 Oct 2026

This profile reports dated public information, including exchange-published services and terms. It does not independently test or guarantee trading, custody, pricing or withdrawals. Inclusion is not an endorsement. Permissions and protections apply only to the named legal entity, service and client category; check the current official records and your contract.

Report an error or submit an update