Azbit: trading controls, withdrawal costs and account restrictions

For spot automation, a post-only instruction is rejected if it would immediately cross the book. Unfilled market-order quantity is cancelled instead of resting. Self-trading is possible by default; an explicit prevention setting changes that behaviour. These details affect whether an order really supplies liquidity, whether an apparent unfilled balance is still committed, and whether a bot can inadvertently trade against its own orders.[8]

Copying has a separate exit decision. The API’s finishMasterCopy operation stops following a master, while its closeOrders flag controls whether existing mirrored positions also close. A customer disconnecting a strategy should inspect the remaining positions and margin afterwards. A historical strategy return does not specify what the follower will receive after different entry prices, funding, commission and execution costs.[13]

The public withdrawal schedule is considerably clearer than a single exchange-wide trading percentage. The inspected website contained conflicting futures fee references: explanatory interface text showed 0.02% maker and 0.05% taker, while server-delivered pair data showed different rates, including 0.025% and 0.06%. A universal current spot or futures rate cannot be established from those competing values; the applicable pair and account fee should be confirmed before an order.[3][1]

Perpetual funding is a transfer between long and short holders, separate from the exchange’s execution charge. Azbit describes the usual settlement times as 00:00, 08:00 and 16:00 UTC, with the contract screen supplying the actual rate and countdown. A positive rate makes longs pay shorts; a negative rate reverses that direction. Closing before the applicable timestamp avoids that particular payment, although closing itself can incur trading costs.[15]

The terms classify some accounts as abandoned after 12 months without use; unsupported balances and unanswered compliance or urgent account requests can also trigger the provision. Storage is charged daily at 0.25% of each asset’s balance when classified. Missing a delisting withdrawal deadline may instead attract a one-time charge equal to the remaining delisted balance.[2]

Crypto deposits must match both the asset and the destination network. The funding guide directs customers to the wallet address or QR code and credits the spot balance after blockchain confirmation. Exchange deposit charges are described as zero, but the sending wallet or network can still charge. The published minimum in a withdrawal row should not be reused as a minimum deposit.[7]

Fiat deposit and withdrawal labels appear in the country/verification matrix, but that matrix does not identify a usable banking partner, currency route, processing period or tariff. This profile therefore does not present a supported bank or card funding facility as established. Crypto routes have a much more concrete public operating description.[4][7]

Azbit’s wallet model places operational control with the platform: it credits account balances, processes withdrawals and separates spendable amounts from funds committed elsewhere. Users should distinguish that custodial balance from coins already delivered to an independently controlled address. A withdrawal request and an on-chain receipt are different stages.[11][7]

The reserves display should be read as an asset disclosure with a limited observable scope. It does not by itself answer whether every customer claim is included, whether assets are encumbered, or which customers would recover funds in an insolvency. No quantified customer insurance entitlement was established in the public materials examined.[6][2]

European restrictions are extensive but should be read country by country. The inspected table included Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands, Ireland, Poland and Nordic countries, among others. It also separately excluded several sanctioned or higher-risk territories. The table can change; an omitted name is not a legal opinion about local permission to use the service.[4]

Azbit promotes round-the-clock support, but no measured response commitment or guaranteed emergency execution channel was established. For a transfer problem, retain the asset, network, amount, transaction hash and account request status. For an order problem, retain its identifier and timestamp. These details let support distinguish a blockchain delay from a wallet review or a matching-engine instruction.[1][7][11]

A lost connection does not cancel spot orders: the API explicitly has no cancel-on-disconnect mechanism. Its cancel-all operation is scoped to the currency pair and can remove manually placed orders as well as bot orders. After reconnecting, query open orders and balances before submitting replacements; otherwise an assumed failure can leave duplicated exposure. Futures automation has a documented clientOrderId mechanism that returns the existing instruction on a repeated identifier.[8][14]

A current regulator-register entry authorising this exact operator and the spot, custody and derivatives services was not established in the inspected source set. Accordingly, no verified permission is assigned here. Country acceptance, AML procedures and a reserve-address page answer different questions from the legal permission to provide a particular financial service.[2][5][4]

The brand’s public about page supplies scale and history claims without a sufficiently clear, consistent measurement basis for a current active-trader count or comparable volume ranking. This profile therefore describes the observable service rather than turning those figures into a market-position claim. Its public product menu includes token listing, affiliates and a separate white-label business link; those business offerings do not establish customer-asset guarantees.[20][1]

Terms distinguish abandoned-balance charging from cancellation of unconfirmed or empty accounts after six months. Account closure, withdrawal completion and deletion of login access should be checked separately. In particular, simply ceasing to trade does not demonstrate that a remaining balance has been withdrawn or that potential storage charges have stopped.[2]

Operator

AZ Strategic Ltd (named in customer terms)

Exchange model

Centralised

Service scope

Custodial spot exchange, leveraged perpetuals, copy trading and selected savings/staking products.

Client types

Retail clients

Pricing publication

Public and quoted pricing

Other names

Azbit Exchange

Pricing scope

Selected network withdrawal tariffs are public. Conflicting futures references prevent a single universal current trading rate being stated.

Funding scope

Documented crypto transfers and internal spot/futures transfers. A current usable fiat route was not established.

Custody and asset handling

Platform wallet balances; withdrawal processing and API key permissions remain under exchange controls. Public reserve addresses do not establish liabilities or insurance.

Client eligibility

Country exclusions and verification apply; futures guide requires verified identity. Consult the current named-country table.

Support

Helpdesk and [email protected]; advertised 24/7 service without a verified response-time commitment.

Authorisation and registration scope

No current regulator-register permission established for AZ Strategic Ltd. AML-law references and governing law are not treated as licences.

Exchange metadata checked 21 Oct 2026Source 2Source 4Source 1Source 7Source 16Source 11Source 3

The AI Hub documents connecting external assistants to market data and account operations. Its published safeguards require explicit confirmation for writes and block withdrawals by default within the skill. Those defaults should not be confused with the permissions of the underlying API key, which can separately allow withdrawals. Restricting the key itself provides an additional control when an assistant or integration is compromised or misconfigured.[12][10]

The inspected earning catalogue contained three named plans with different annual accrual settings and minimum subscriptions. Those published parameters do not establish a fixed future yield, an insured principal, or an equivalence to holding the same token in a personal wallet. Before subscribing, the relevant unresolved details are how earnings are funded, when redemption is actually available and whether the subscription changes the customer’s claim on the exchange.[19]

Transaction history and machine-readable API records are documented, but a complete jurisdiction-specific tax statement or universal CSV export was not established. Store the original execution and transfer records in addition to any summary. Promotional credits or rewards likewise need their own withdrawal conditions; the inspected general service pages do not establish that every advertised credit is withdrawable cash.[11][14][1]